Queen Elizabeth II news: The TWO reasons the Queen would never abdicate
Queen Elizabeth II is the UK’s longest-reigning monarch, having spent nearly 70 years as the country’s head of state. Once she gives up her position, Prince Charles, the longest king-in-waiting will replace her, but it could be some time before he can assume his birthright.
The Queen famously stated she would stay on the throne until her death and would not consider abdication.
Rumours of retirement dogged her last year, as people predict the monarch will step down at 95.
In a statement, a spokesperson for the Palace said: “There are no plans for any change in arrangements at the age of 95 — or any other age.”
The Queen’s reluctance to retire allegedly comes from her family experience and allegiance to the throne.
- Meghan Markle heartbreak: The hidden meaning behind the Duchess’
According to University College London’s Constitution Unit, the Queen will not retire for two reasons.
They said: “The first is the bad example of Edward VIII: his abdication brought the Queen’s father onto the throne, unexpectedly and most reluctantly.
“The second is her declaration on her twenty-first birthday that she would serve for her whole life whether it be long or short.
“She is also said to regard her oath at her coronation as imposing a sacred duty to reign as long as she shall live.”
By the time the Queen eventually passes on the throne, Prince Charles will have waited more than 70 years to become King.
The Constitution Unit added it is unlikely the Prince of Wales would immediately pass on the reigns to his son Prince William, as he has spent “so long” preparing.
They said: “Having waited over 70 years as heir apparent, it would be perfectly natural for Prince Charles to want to assume the throne and perform the royal duties for which he has spent so long preparing in waiting.
“But it would be equally natural if, after reigning for a few years as an increasingly elderly monarch, he chose to invite Parliament to hand on the throne to Prince William.”
Heartbreaking reason Prince Philip will spend Valentine’s Day alone – INSIGHT
The REAL reason Princess Beatrice’s landed top royal wedding venue – INSIGHT
Queen hands huge new role to Prince William to take on ‘high profile’ – INSIGHT
- Prince Harry regret: Duke in shock update on life away
The unit added Prince Charles is entitled to become King under common law, and the monarchy could not skip to William.
The only way William could take the throne would be if Charles decided to abdicate.
To do so, the Duke of Cornwall would require a change in legislation.
When the Queen’s uncle stepped down in 1938, he used the Declaration of Abdication Act 1936.
If they wished to abdicate, neither the Queen nor a future King would be able to without first consulting Parliament.
Parliament is responsible for regulating the line of succession via acts passed through both houses.
The most recent was the Succession to the Crown Act 2013, which ended male primogeniture when a younger son can displace an older daughter in the line of succession.
Another, the Act of Succession 1700, decreed the crown would only go to protestants.
Source: Read Full Article